What Makes Something Shitty?
If you asked me to name the worst movies of all time, three movies come to mind:
Legally Blond 2, Armageddon, and Daredevil.
And wholly shit is Daredevil so much worse than those other two.
And I am fully aware that there are many movies probably much worse than Armageddon and a few other movies that sucked more than Legally Blond 2, but none have annoyed me as much as these three.
Which raises the question, what makes us hate or love a movie? For the most part, a movie can be judged on its own standing. No matter what you were doing and where you were when you saw films like Casblanca and Crash, chances are you will like them. And movies like Gymkata or Earnest Saves Christmas will be universally ridiculed.
But there should be a subgenre of films that we judge mostly based on the context of how we saw them. Movies like Son-In-Law, Starship Troopers, Kingpin, or, well, Armageddon could be fondly remembered or loathed depending on who you were with and what you were doing when you saw it.
Take Son-In-Law, for example. I saw it when I lived in Iowa City with a bunch of fellow cooks that I worked with in a restuarant. It may have been related the kilo of dope they smoked over the course of ten years, but they thought Pauley Shore was a comic genius. And then, so did I. But then I rented Jury Duty awhile later, and hated it. Same jackass actor, same dumbshit jokes, but since I watched it by myself with a frozen pizza instead of four burned-out cooks, the movie sucked ass. Pauly Shore a comic genius? Not so much.
Kingpin will always be a comic tour-de-force for me, since I saw it on a "Pissing the Day Away Saturday" with my friends back when I was in grad school (including
this girl whom I hadn't yet considered dating yet). So I pissed the day away with this hip 20something crew, by eating some brunch, walking around a lake, playing some football, watching Kingpin, and then drinking some beers before going out to drink more beers. How can Kingpin not be the greatest movie ever under those circumstances? It may have been a much worse movie if I saw it on an airplane or in a hotel room by myself.
Or I remember watching Weekend at Bernie's and Look Who's Talking in a dollar theater, back when dollar theaters were a new concept, and was thought those movies were hilarious. This could only happen because I was 1) in high school, so my time wasn't the premium it is today 2) I only paid $1 to see it, back when paying $1 for a movie was a novel concept. It was a perfect storm of timing for these movies to be funny to me.
But seriously, there is no way Daredevil can be saved. A Frog Takes A Shit would be a better movie.
I don't care if they showed it on the jumbotron before the start of a Spurs/Pistons game 7 of the NBA Championships AND I was there with 300 of my closest friends AND it was free beer and taco night AND the Spurs went on to win the title when Bruce Bowen blocked Rip Hamilton's shot and threw the ball down to a wide-open Tim Duncan for the game winner AND then afterwards a scientist announced the discovery of a mint chocloate chip ice cream that is good for you and cures cancer AND
Emily defended and passed her PhD dissertation, while she was at the game AND she was offered a kickass job before the start of the 3rd quarter that made it so I could be a stay-at-home Dad for our dog Pancho AND during the first period I ran sub 14:00 5k around the upper deck of SBC center while watching the game.
It wouldn't matter. Daredevil still would have been a shitty shitty movie. Serioulsy. Worst movie ever. I challenge you to come up with a worse movie.
You can't.